Four
of the major international oil companies are facing a decline in global
production of crude, despite unprecedented profits. Can they reverse the trend?
The American oil company ExxonMobil, first
company in the world according to Forbes magazine, has since 2007 a sharp decline in its production, after more than a century of uninterrupted expansion.
company in the world according to Forbes magazine, has since 2007 a sharp decline in its production, after more than a century of uninterrupted expansion.
In
2011, the ExxonMobil oil extractions reached 2,312 million barrels per
day (Mb/d), falling 4.5% compared with 2010 and 11.6% compared to 2007,
according to the data available in the latest annual report of the
group.
Very poor
result for the n ° 1 of the majors, while the gross consumption
increased in the meantime and the barrel price continue since 2007 to
levels never seen before until then.
Yet
the number of drilling undertaken by ExxonMobil around the world
increased very strongly, from 971 new wells in 2007 to 1 249 in 2010,
and then 1 606 in 2011, representing an increase of 65% over four years.
Same trend with respect to annual net production
costs: Exxon rose from 78.6 billion dollars in 2007 to 152.5 billion in
2010, and then to 166.7 billion in 2011 (+ 112% in four years!).
97% of new wells drilled by Exxon were known and already exploited fields.
The year 2007 will be the year of peak oil for the eldest daughter of Standard Oil, founded in 1870 by John D. Rockefeller? The answer will come. In
the meantime, Exxon has confirmed the continuation of the drop in
production in its latest quarterly report, released in November. maintain the production becomes "a recurring challenge", reports Reuters news agency.
Decreases of the extractions of Exxon in particular affect Africa (notably Nigeria and Angola) and the North Sea. The Middle East, the Russia and Caspian region are spared.
The
American continent, the rear base of the firm, shows in 2011 on
resumption of the production of crude oil and its surrogates. This
recovery, generously welcomed US and discount press ahead on this blog,
is not enough to time to bring Exxon retrievals on the whole of the
American continent to the level achieved in 2007, or stop (far from it)
the fall of its global production.
The
fall in production of Exxon turns into collapse if we consider the
production of conventional crude — conventional liquid oil, which is
almost two-thirds of the offer of the American giant: reached 1.338 Mb/d
in 2011, after 1,496 Mb / in 2010 (-10,5 %) to 1.875 Mb/d in 2007
(27.5%!)
Exxon eat black bread: "what else?" Its
main development prospects lie in Iraq (where Exxon is more than ever
in delicacy with the Baghdad Government, and takes the risk of being
shut down access to more massive projects), in the Russian Arctic (where
the interference by the yankee tanker could remain a vain Tower of
strength, according to the latest forecasts pessimistic ― published by
the International Energy Agency) and finally in North America where uncertainties remain... many.
Royal Dutch Shell, no. 2 among the large international oil companies, looks a bit better than Exxon.
Nevertheless,
its extraction of crude oil and liquid natural gas recorded a decrease
of 9.5% between 2010 and 2011, to 1.536 Mb/d, according to the latest
annual report. Trending erratic in the best of
cases, since the previous year, the production of Shell had instead
increased to a similar extent. (Alas, Shell
provides no separate data for crude oil on the one hand and natural gas
liquid on the other hand, although the functions of these two products
are far from being interchangeable, especially for the manufacture of
fuel).
Shell
boss, Peter Voser, acknowledged last year that given the current pace
of decline of the existing world, the oil industry should be able to develop over the next decade "the equivalent of four Saudi Arabia or ten northern seas
(...) as a whole just to keep offers at its current level"...
Symbolic? Shell saw last week one of its offshore platforms running aground in Alaska following a storm. The website of Forbes magazine refers to a pure and simple "fiasco" of Royal Dutch Shell in the Arctic. The
Financial Times noted yesterday how it will be difficult to develop
resources in the far North offshore, ultimate vast largely unexplored
region on Earth.
BP also had to stop its efforts to drill off the coast of Alaska in 2012.
The ex-British Petroleum saw also his overall production of crude decline very strongly. In 2011, it has reached 2,157 Mb/d, down 9.1% compared to 2010, and 15% from 2009, according to the latest annual report.
BP production is declining just about anywhere, including in the North Sea, Africa, and America. Far
from enough to offset these many declines, the British back in Iraq in
2011 of the national steward again confirms the key position now
occupied by Baghdad on the Board of the black gold.
Nowhere
else in Azerbaijan, former Soviet Republic located between the Caucasus
and the Caspian Sea, the difficulties of BP appear more glaring. Very sound way, the local potentate, Ilham Aliyev expressed in October his anger:
"It is absolutely unacceptable (...) Investors who are not able to hold their obligations and to respect the contracts must learn the lesson. Harsh measures should be taken, and will be taken."
After
reaching a record production in 2010, the large set of known as
offshore oil fields Azeri-Chirag-Guneshli, launched in 1997 by BP,
currently crosses a sacred hole of air, with a fall of 12.7% in 2011
alone. A fall that continued through the year 2012, is the specialized agency Platts.
The total extraction of the Azerbaijan declined by 11.4% between 2010 and 2011.
The
azeri production is referred to as 'mature', hear that most of the
older oil fields in the country are now almost exhausted, and provide
almost more gross. Azerbaijan (in particular its
capital, Baku) was one of the two cradles of the oil industry at the end
of the 19th century with the U.S. State of Pennsylvania.
Hope
crucial to maintain fetches this ancient oil countries and very
generous so far, the offshore Azeri-Chirag-Guneshli complex has a very
complex geology, precisely. BP needs to drill new wells to stop the bleeding, as it is committed. To
do this, she however seems to lack of drilling platforms, or unwilling
to invest with a high risk of ending up with new 'dry' wells, suggests
the Agency Platts.
Decline
of conventional oil, in particular in the oldest producing countries
outside OPEC, uncertain capacity of unconventional oils and the offshore
production to compensate for this decline: all familiar symptoms
already encountered often in the folder of peak oil.
.
No comments:
Post a Comment